Friday, October 24, 2014

Gestalt Psychology and Art History: Painting

 Paul Cézanne, Still Life with Apples 1895-98
Oil on canvas; 68.8 x 92.7 cm
The Museum of Modern Art, New York

Schapiro clearly leans toward holism not only at the level of the milieu, but also at the level of the individual work: “a painting is…a concrete individual object; we grasp its parts immediately and sometimes simultaneously, all together as a whole, as we do an object in nature” (Schapiro, 1999:11-12).  This may again reflect the influence of Gestalt psychology, which, as it happens, is a distinctively successful example of a holistic theory applied to an empirical and experimental science.   Gestalt psychology assumes the concept of the lebenswelt and focuses on the perception of the living organism.  Perceptual life is structured by relations of field and ground whereby organisms attend differentially to biologically relevant aspects of their environment.  The organism is not reduced to the purely biotic processes within cells, tissues, and organs, like salt diffusing across semi-permeable membranes.  Instead, Gestalt psychology takes the animal’s perceptual experience of its environs as an irreducible dimension of explanation.  Schapiro applied the concept of field-ground relations in his 1969 discussion of the systematic unity of the artwork, where he addresses special problems pertaining to the perception of artworks:
…we have learned often enough how limited is our perception of such complex wholes as works of art…in an object as complex as a novel, a building, a picture, a sonata, our impression of the whole is a resultant or summation in which some elements can be changed with little apparent difference to our sense of the whole; perception of such complexities is rapid and tolerant, isolating certain features and passing freely over others, and admitting much vagueness for the sake of larger effects.[1]




[1]. Meyer Schapiro, “On Perfection, Coherence, and Unity of Form and Content” in Theory and Philosophy of Art: Style, Artist, and Society (Selected Papers IV) George Brazilier, 1994 p. 37