What kind of knowledge is art
history? Is it a science, a branch of the humanities, or some
combination? What is its relationship to the social sciences and the physical
sciences? These questions are interesting and important in
themselves. But they also shed light on contemporary debates in the
philosophy of the social sciences. For the art historian must
constantly draw on the resources of sociology, anthropology, economics and so
on, all themselves based on history to varying degrees. So if we
look at art history from the viewpoint of epistemology, we will naturally have
to address the key issues in the philosophy of the social sciences: differences
between and among the physical sciences, the social sciences, and the
humanities; contrasts between causes and reasons; questions of reductionism and
holism; issues of description, explanation and prediction; debates surrounding
the nature of objectivity, interpretation, and understanding (verstehen), and
so forth. And of course, the absolutely central issue of historicism
is particularly important here because art history is, after all, an historical
discipline. To study the epistemology of art history is to engage
all of these issues.
No comments:
Post a Comment